<DIV class=quote><B>以下是引用<I>GriGri</I>在2005-1-28 14:45:27的发言:</B>
<P>How dare you compare China with Japan?</P>
<P>Japan was controlled and managed by the US after the war and with the financial help from the US, it developed quickly.</P>
<P>As for China, it relied on no one but itself. We strived hard to beat up our economy even after few political crisis.</P>
<P>Moreover, the battlefield was not in Japan other than the 2 nuclear bombs, but everthing was burnt by them here in China, and men were slaughtered.</P>
<P>Most importantly they transported a large amount of treasure back to there country for their own development. That was also the reason why they invaded China. After the industry revolution Japan's economy was really bad so the only way to survive was to rob others.</P></DIV>
<P>
<P>I even compare it with India, and no, Japan wasn't controlled and managed by the US after the war. Japan had already becomes self-sufficient after the 50s. Go and look up the history of government parties in power from the end of WWII up until present. They were kept this way since the 50s because America didn't want Japan turning communist during the Cold War like many of the other Asian nations (also the reason why Japan has the second highest number of US military bases in the world--second only to the US). </P>
<P>As for china, most of the china-land are still in the arid land even place like beijing (since you're from beijing) having desert sand storm, it is been saying the capital its gonna move to chengdu of southern china.</P>
<P>The battlefield was not in Japan other than the 2 nuclear bombs?? -- Knowing how the maries fight their own way all across Tarawa to Tokyo, and no, everthing was burnt by the chinese govt themselves in china it has nothing to do with the Imperial Japan.</P>
<P>And how are those "treasure" as you claimed was going to benefit the econ of Japan after they had carried back. There is nothing clear and straight on your part. Your over sino centric view and inability to clearly give a reason for your argument shows that it doesn't have a solid base to back up. The sole argument you have is that its "commonly" agreed only by the PRCs, such argument is laughable and would get you no where in the reality of facts. </P>
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-1-31 18:55:30编辑过] |